Articles

THE ROLE OF DIGITALIZATION, ADAPTIVE COLLABORATION, AND SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES IN STRENGTHENING MSME SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN ACCOUNTABILITY: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Eka Siskawati1, Sri Mangesti Rahayu2, Yudi Yudi2, Firman Surya3, Halkadri Fitra4
  1. 1 Department of Accounting, Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  2. 2 Department of Accounting, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
  3. 3 Department of Accounting, Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  4. 4 Department of Accounting, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia

Abstract

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) play a critical role in the global economy, yet they face persistent challenges in integrating sustainability into supply chain management. Limited resources, low awareness, and market pressures often hinder their ability to achieve accountability in balancing economic, social, and environmental goals. This study aims to synthesize the literature on the role of digitalization, adaptive collaboration, and sustainability practices in strengthening accountability within Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) for MSMEs. The research employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by PRISMA methodology to ensure transparency and replicability. Data were collected from the Scopus database covering the years 2020–2025, yielding 232 initial studies. After a rigorous screening and eligibility process, 43 relevant articles were selected as the final sample. Articles were coded based on digitalization, collaboration, sustainability, and accountability indicators. A thematic synthesis was conducted to identify key patterns, interrelationships, and conceptual contributions. The results show that digital technologies enhance transparency and efficiency, adaptive collaboration fosters resilience and flexibility, and sustainability practices strengthen legitimacy through social and environmental reporting. These findings confirm that SSCM accountability is multidimensional. The study provides theoretical integration and practical insights to guide MSMEs toward more accountable and sustainable supply chain practices.

How to Cite

Siskawati, E., Rahayu, S. M., Yudi, Y., Surya, F., & Fitra, H. (2025). THE ROLE OF DIGITALIZATION, ADAPTIVE COLLABORATION, AND SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES IN STRENGTHENING MSME SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN ACCOUNTABILITY: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. ACTA INNOVATIONS, 57(4), 20–31. Retrieved from https://actainnovations.com/index.php/pub/article/view/492
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Abbasi, K., Alam, A., Anna, M., Luu, T., & Huynh, D. (2020). Technological Forecasting & Social Change FinTech, SME efficiency and national culture: Evidence from OECD countries. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, May, 120454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120454
  2. Abbasi, K., Alam, A., Du, M. (Anna), & Huynh, T. L. D. (2021). FinTech, SME efficiency and national culture: Evidence from OECD countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120454
  3. Anthonysamy, L. A. /. P., Siddika, A., & Aqlily, N. R. (2025). Navigating Cultural Barriers: The Role of Socio-Technical Systems in Digital Transformation Readiness in SMEs. Emerging Science Journal, 9(3), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-03-06
  4. Arbelo, A., Arbelo-Pérez, M., & Pérez-Gómez, P. (2020). Profit Efficiency as a Measure of Performance and Frontier Models: A Resource-Based View. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420924336
  5. Ariadi, G., & Rohman, F. (2021). The effect of lean and agile supply chain strategy on financial performance with mediating of strategic supplier integration & strategic customer integration : Evidence from bottled drinking-water industry in Indonesia The effect of lean and agile supply . Cogent Business & Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1930500
  6. Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Understanding the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030760
  7. Chen, D., Gummi, U. M., Ibrahim, M., & Tahir, F. A. (2024). Sustainable supply chain management operations: does sustainable environmental disclosure matter for banks’ financial performance in Nigeria? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1499. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04008-y
  8. Chen, X., Chen, S., Wu, Z., Wang, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impact of centralized band purchasing of pharmaceuticals on innovation of Chinese pharmaceutical firms: an empirical study based on double difference models. Frontiers in Public Health, 12(July), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406254
  9. Cheng, W., Li, Q., Wu, Q., Ye, F., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Digital capability and green innovation: The perspective of green supply chain collaboration and top management’s environmental awareness. Heliyon, 10(11), e32290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32290
  10. Cheng, W., Wu, Q., Li, Q., Ye, F., & Tan, L. (2024). Dynamic Incentive Mechanisms for Collaborative Innovation of Green Supply Chain Considering Digital Capability and Consumer Green Preference.
  11. Correggi, C., Di Toma, P., & Ghinoi, S. (2024). Rethinking dynamic capabilities in light of sustainability: A bibliometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 7990–8016. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3901
  12. Cosic, R., Shanks, G., & Maynard, S. (2015). A business analytics capability framework. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 19, S5–S19. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v19i0.1150
  13. D’Angelo, V., & Belvedere, V. (2023). Green Supply Chains and Digital Supply Chains: Identifying Overlapping Areas. Sustainability, 15(12), 9828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129828
  14. Dharmayanti, N., Ismail, T., Hanifah, I. A., & Taqi, M. (2023). Exploring sustainability management control system and eco-innovation matter sustainable financial performance: The role of supply chain management and digital adaptability in indonesian context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100119
  15. Dong, T., Yin, S., & Zhang, N. (2023). The Interaction Mechanism and Dynamic Evolution of Digital Green Innovation in the Integrated Green Building Supply Chain. Systems, 11(3), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030122
  16. Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Aydin, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1524–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338
  17. Eslami, M. H., Jafari, H., Achtenhagen, L., Carlbäck, J., & Wong, A. (2024). Financial performance and supply chain dynamic capabilities: the Moderating Role of Industry 4.0 technologies. International Journal of Production Research, 62(22), 8092–8109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1966850
  18. Gonçalves, H., Magalhães, V. S. M., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., & Arantes, A. (2024). Overcoming Barriers to Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020506
  19. Hategan, C. D., Sirghi, N., Curea-Pitorac, R. I., & Hategan, V. P. (2018). Doing well or doing good: The relationship between corporate social responsibility and profit in Romanian companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041041
  20. Saldaña, D., Montealegre, K., Castro, C., & Rey, M. (2025). Genomic Biomarkers and Clinical Perspectives of Fluoropyrimidines in Cancer Treatment. A Literature Review. Genetics and Molecular Research, 24(2), 1-21.
  21. Parrey, M. (2025). Determination of the role of RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism in diabetic retinopathy in South Asian Population. Genetics and Molecular Research, 24(1), 1-8.
  22. Carpentieri-Pipolo, V. (2025). Root System Architecture in Wheat: Implications for the Breeding Program. Genetics and Molecular Research, 24(2), 1-14.
  23. Al-Shammaa, N. F. K. (2025). Enhancing Women's Fertility: Insights and StrategiesBased on Scientific Evidence. Genetics and Molecular Research, 24(1), 1-11.
  24. dos Santos, D. G., de Avellar, G. S., da Costa Parrella, R. A., dos Santos, N. M., Damasceno, N. C. R., Rezende, K. A. S., ... & Mentes, S. M. (2025). Biology and Life Table of Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald, 1904)(Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Sweet Sorghum Hybrids (Sorghum bicolor). Genetics and Molecular Research, 24(2), 1-12.
  25. Heldt, L., & Beske-Janssen, P. (2023). Solutions from space? A dynamic capabilities perspective on the growing use of satellite technology for managing sustainability in multi-tier supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 260(April), 108864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108864
  26. Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221
  27. Hong, S., & Najmi, H. (2020). The Relationships between Supply Chain Capability and Shareholder Value Using Financial Performance Indicators. Sustainability, 12(8), 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083130
  28. Hussain, A., Akbar, M., Shahzad, A., Poulova, P., Akbar, A., & Hassan, R. (2022). E-Commerce and SME Performance: The Moderating Influence of Entrepreneurial Competencies. Administrative Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010013
  29. Juan, S., & Li, E. Y. (2023). Financial performance of firms with supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of dynamic capability and supply chain resilience. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(5), 712–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2022-0249
  30. Jum’a, L., Zimon, D., & Ikram, M. (2021). A relationship between supply chain practices, environmental sustainability and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing companies in jordan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042152
  31. Kalyar, M. N., Shoukat, A., & Shafique, I. (2019). Enhancing firms’ environmental performance and financial performance through green supply chain management practices and institutional pressures. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(2), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2019-0047
  32. Kamasak, R. (2017). The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(2), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-015
  33. Khan, M. N., Akhtar, P., Zhang, L. L., & Khan, Z. (2024). Operating in environments affected by uncertainty: Supply chain finance, timely information sharing using advanced technology, and financial performance in Supply Chain Management 4.0. Journal of General Management, 50(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070241263155
  34. Konopik, J., Jahn, C., Schuster, T., Hoßbach, N., & Pflaum, A. (2022). Mastering the digital transformation through organizational capabilities: A conceptual framework. Digital Business, 2(2), 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100019
  35. Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63(December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466
  36. Kumar, V., Syan, A. S., & Kaur, K. (2022). A structural equation modeling analysis of factors driving customer purchase intention towards solar water heater. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2020-0069
  37. Lee, R. (2021). The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Operational and Financial Performance. Sustainability, 13(9), 5138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095138
  38. Lerman, L. V., Benitez, G. B., Müller, J. M., de Sousa, P. R., & Frank, A. G. (2022). Smart green supply chain management: a configurational approach to enhance green performance through digital transformation. Supply Chain Management, 27(7), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2022-0059
  39. Li, M., Dong, H., Yu, H., Sun, X., & Zhao, H. (2023). Evolutionary Game and Simulation of Collaborative Green Innovation in Supply Chain under Digital Enablement. Sustainability, 15(4), 3125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043125
  40. Li, W., Xiao, X., Yang, X., & Li, L. (2023). How Does Digital Transformation Impact Green Supply Chain Development? An Empirical Analysis Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework. Systems, 11(8), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080416
  41. Ma, X., Akhtar, R., Akhtar, A., Hashim, R. A., & Sibt-e-Ali, M. (2022). Mediation effect of environmental performance in the relationship between green supply chain management practices, institutional pressures, and financial performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(August), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.972555
  42. Małys, Ł. (2022). ICT Utilization in Supply Chain Environmental Collaboration Practices as the Moderator of Firms’ Financial Performance. Sustainability, 14(2), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020958
  43. Munir, M., & Bhutta, N. T. (2023). Light in the tunnel or just a train; impact of supply chain finance solutions on financial service providers’ financial performance by mitigating financial risk. PLOS ONE, 18(12), e0292497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292497
  44. Pak, J. Y., Thai, V. V., & Yeo, G. T. (2015). Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Intangible Resources Affecting Port Service Quality. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31(4), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.01.004
  45. Pan, C., Liao, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Knowledge mapping of resilience and human rights in supply chains: A roadmapping taxonomy for twin green and digital transition design. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11(April), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1152345
  46. Piprani, A. Z., Khan, S. A. R., & Yu, Z. (2024). Driving success through digital transformation: influence of Industry 4.0 on lean, agile, resilient, green supply chain practices. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(6), 1175–1198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2023-0179
  47. Qiao, J., Li, S., Xiong, S., & Li, N. (2023). How Does the Digital Capability Advantage Affect Green Supply Chain Innovation? An Inter-Organizational Learning Perspective. Sustainability, 15(15), 11583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511583
  48. Rajapakse, R. M. D. A. P., Azam, S. M. F., & Khatibi, A. (2022). Towards Green Credentials of SMEs: Qualitative Insights on Barriers to Green Responsiveness from a Developing Economy. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 14(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v14i1.635
  49. Rehman, S. U., Bhatti, A., Kraus, S., & Ferreira, J. J. M. (2020). The role of environmental management control systems for ecological sustainability and sustainable performance. Management Decision, 59(9), 2217–2237. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2020-0800
  50. Reyna-Castillo, M., Vera Martínez, P. S., Farah-Simón, L., & Simón, N. (2023). Social Sustainability Orientation and Supply Chain Performance in Mexico, Colombia and Chile: A Social-Resource-Based View (SRBV). Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043751
  51. Reza-Gharehbagh, R., Arisian, S., Hafezalkotob, A., & Makui, A. (2023). Sustainable supply chain finance through digital platforms: a pathway to green entrepreneurship. Annals of Operations Research, 331(1), 285–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04623-5
  52. Rodríguez-González, R. M., Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2022). Does circular economy affect financial performance? The mediating role of sustainable supply chain management in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(October), 134670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134670
  53. Rodríguez‐González, R. M., Maldonado‐Guzman, G., & Madrid‐Guijarro, A. (2022). The effect of green strategies and eco‐innovation on Mexican automotive industry sustainable and financial performance: Sustainable supply chains as a mediating variable. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(4), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2233
  54. Rutainurwa, V., Mwenda, B., & Israel, B. (2024). ICT-enabled supply chain integration capabilities and firms ’ financial performance : an empirical study of Tanzania ’ s manufacturing SMEs. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2393235
  55. Supriyono, Probohudono, A. N., & Suhardjanto, D. (2024). Model for Strengthening MSMEs in the Cultural Heritage of Borobudur Temple Based on the Green Industry Concept: A Mixed-Method Analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(5), 1955–1961. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190534
  56. Tarnoto, N., & Liu, C. (2024). Attachment and problematic smartphone use among Indonesian college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a serial mediation model. Current Psychology, 43(46), 35709–35721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06787-8
  57. Teirlinck, P., & Khoshnevis, P. (2022). SME efficiency in transforming regional business research and innovation investments into innovative sales output. Regional Studies, 56(12), 2147–2163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2046263
  58. Tufan, C., Çiğdem, Ş., Kılıç, Y., & Sayar, G. (2024). Agility and Resilience in Supply Chains: Investigating Their Roles in Enhancing Financial Performance. Sustainability, 16(17), 7842. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177842
  59. Venkatarman, A., & Rajkumar, A. D. (2024). Rajkumar and Venkataraman: Cross-Sectioning Sustainable Supply Chain Governance: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Review of Management and Marketing, 14(3), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.16105
  60. Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Qin, Z., Yang, Y., & Li, J. (2023). A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management. Sustainability, 15(11), 8564. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118564
  61. Yu, H., Qubi, W., & Luo, J. (2025). Digital Transformation in Agricultural Supply Chains Enhances Green Productivity: Evidence From Provincial Data in China. Earth’s Future, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006089
  62. Yu, Y., Zhang, M., & Huo, B. (2021). The impact of relational capital on green supply chain management and financial performance. Production Planning & Control, 32(10), 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1774675
  63. Zeng, H., Li, R. Y. M., & Zeng, L. (2022). Evaluating green supply chain performance based on ESG and financial indicators. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(September), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.982828
  64. Zhang, S., Zhu, C., & Xin, J. (2024). CloudScale : A Lightweight AI Framework for Predictive Supply Chain Risk Management in Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises. 4(2), 1–22.
  65. Zhang, X., Xu, Y. Y., & Ma, L. (2023). Information technology investment and digital transformation: the roles of digital transformation strategy and top management. Business Process Management Journal, 29(2), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2022-0254
  66. Zhao, J., & Liu, X. (2024). ICT, Supply Chain Digital Integration Capability, and Firm Financial Performance: The Antagonistic Effects of Perceived Government Support and Cognitive Constraints on Digital Transformation. Sage Open, 14(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241241887
  67. Zhao, S., Hafeez, M., & Faisal, C. M. N. (2022). Does ICT diffusion lead to energy efficiency and environmental sustainability in emerging Asian economies? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(8), 12198–12207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16560-0