Articles
DOI DOI: 10.62441/actainnovations.v63i.1365

DIGITAL PLATFORMS, INDUSTRY 4.0, AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC RESILIENCE: RECOVERY PATHWAYS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FROM THE SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Hang Thi Bich TRAN1, Thi Thuy Hang VU2, Xuan Lam Nguyen 3
  1. 1 Department of Training Administration, Thuongmai University, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  2. 2 Faculty of Electronic Commerce, Thuongmai University, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam.
  3. 3 Faculty of Electronic Commerce, Thuongmai University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.

Abstract

This study contributes to the growing body of literature on digital platforms, Industry 4.0, and regional economic resilience by systematically examining how digital transformation supports recovery pathways and policy responses in the post-pandemic era. Based on 78 Scopus-indexed documents published between 2020 and 2025, this research combines bibliographic analysis and systematic document review to map publishing trends, document types, influential countries, leading journals, highly cited publications, and thematic structures. The results show a steady increase in academic interest, with the number of publications rising from 1 in 2020 to 25 in 2025. Journal articles dominate the dataset, accounting for 74.4% of total publications, indicating the academic consolidation of this research field. Countries such as France, Australia, Israel, Greece, and Germany contribute significantly to this field, reflecting its international and interdisciplinary nature. Journals of Business Research, Educational Sciences, and Digital Society and Geography emerge as major publishing channels, while highly cited studies focus on remote work, online education, hyperlocal delivery, workplace behaviour, sustainability, marketing, and platform-based services. Thematic analysis identifies six main groups: human-centred digital competency formation; Digital marketing, social media, and sustainable platform-based markets; digitalisation, mobility, and development pathways in emerging contexts; digital innovation, online learning, and innovation efficiency; artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and platform-based crisis governance; and digital capabilities, urban adaptability, and the technological future. These findings demonstrate that regional economic resilience in the digital age is shaped by the interplay between human capabilities, platform-based market coordination, innovation systems, mobility and inclusion, intelligent governance, and place-based adaptation. This research advances a path-based understanding of digital resilience and offers policy implications for building comprehensive, adaptive, and sustainable regional development strategies. Future research should continue to examine regional differences through longitudinal, comparative, and context-specific empirical studies.

How to Cite

Bich TRAN, H. T., Hang VU, T. T., & Nguyen , X. L. (2026). DIGITAL PLATFORMS, INDUSTRY 4.0, AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC RESILIENCE: RECOVERY PATHWAYS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FROM THE SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. ACTA INNOVATIONS, 63, 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.62441/actainnovations.v63i.1365
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. 1. ADB. (2025). Digital Technology in Asia and the Pacific. https://www.adb.org/what-we-do/topics/digital-technology
  2. 2. Asif, M., & Fazel, H. (2024). Digital technology in tourism: a bibliometric analysis of transformative trends and emerging research patterns. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(3), 1615–1635. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-11-2023-0847
  3. 3. Bandrova, T., Dinkov, D., & Vasilev, S. (2025). Strategy for the Development of Cartography in Bulgaria with a 10-Year Planning Horizon (2025–2035) in the Context of Industry 4.0 and 5.0. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(8), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14080289
  4. 4. Ben Youssef, A. (2025). Twin Transition: Digital Transformation Pathways for Sustainable Innovation. Sustainability, 17(21), 9491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219491
  5. 5. Bouyssou, D., & Marchant, T. (2011). Bibliometric rankings of journals based on Impact Factors: An axiomatic approach. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.09.001
  6. 6. Brzezinski, M. (2015). Power laws in citation distributions: evidence from Scopus. Scientometrics, 103(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1524-z
  7. 7. Carrigan, M., & Jordan, K. (2022). Platforms and Institutions in the Post-Pandemic University: a Case Study of Social Media and the Impact Agenda. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(2), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00269-x
  8. 8. Corallo, A., De Lorenzi, M. C., Latino, M. E., & Menegoli, M. (2025). Sustainability‐Driven Legitimacy Through Industry 4.0: Insights From European Agri‐Food Giants. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 7772–7792. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70109
  9. 9. Diniță, A., Rosca, C.-M., Stancu, A., & Popescu, C. (2025). Distributed IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance Framework for Solar Panels Using Cloud Machine Learning in Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 17(21), 9412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219412
  10. 10. Domina, O., Andriushchenko, K., Liezina, A., Tsymbalenko, Y., Titova, O., Kyryliuk, O., & Vylgin, Y. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Formation of a Teacher’s Digital Twin in the Metaverse. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 12(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.12.3.169-185
  11. 11. Dwivedy, M., Pandit, D., & Khatter, K. (2025). Assessment of Smart Manufacturing Readiness for Small and Medium Enterprises in the Indian Automotive Sector. Sustainability, 17(18), 8096. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188096
  12. 12. Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075
  13. 13. Ecker, Y., & Strüver, A. (2022). Towards alternative platform futures in post-pandemic cities? A case study on platformization and changing socio-spatial relations in on-demand food delivery. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100032
  14. 14. El Archi, Y., Benbba, B., Kabil, M., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Digital Technologies for Sustainable Tourism Destinations: State of the Art and Research Agenda. Administrative Sciences, 13(8), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13080184
  15. 15. Go Global. (2025). 13 key global e-commerce stats every e-tailer should know. https://www.textmaster.com/blog/e-commerce-global-statistics-2025/
  16. 16. Guru, S., Verma, S., Baheti, P., & Dagar, V. (2023). Assessing the feasibility of hyperlocal delivery model as an effective distribution channel. Management Decision, 61(6), 1634–1655. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2022-0407
  17. 17. Guz, A. N., & Rushchitsky, J. J. (2009). Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. International Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4
  18. 18. Hang Vu, Thi Thuy, & Nguyen, D. M. (2026). Unveiling Trends in Digital Distance Learning Research. In Peer-to-Peer Learning in Online and Hybrid Education (pp. 317–348). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1732-8.ch011
  19. 19. Hang Vu, T. T., Hai Ha, H., & Duc-Minh, N. (2026). Visualising the Research Landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Community-Based Tourism. In Tourism Technology, Sustainability, and Local Community Empowerment (pp. 244–261). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003661368-14
  20. 20. Insight Report. (2024). The Future of Growth Report 2024 (Issue January).
  21. 21. Jena, R. K. (2022). Investigating and Predicting Intentions to Continue Using Mobile Payment Platforms after the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study among Retailers in India. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(7), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070314
  22. 22. Jun, S., Lee, C., Youn, S. J., & Lee, C. (2025). Technological Convergence and Innovation Pathways in Sustainable Logistics Systems: An Integrated Graph Neural Network and Main Path Analysis. Sustainability, 17(23), 10507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310507
  23. 23. Kuttler, T. (2023). The spatial politics of platformization: Negotiating platform power in everyday taxi driving in Mumbai. Geoforum, 147, 103890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103890
  24. 24. Latuheru, R., Bahfiarti, T., & Sonni, A. F. (2025). Marinyo as a medium of traditional communication in the digital era: hybridization, opinion leadership, and cultural sustainability in Ambonese society. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1602249
  25. 25. Le-Dinh, T., Le, T. D., & Labelle, F. (2025). Digital technologies in the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Trade Science, 13(4), 252–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-04-2025-0016
  26. 26. Machado, E., Miranda, S., & Baldi, V. (2024). Dominant Communication Strategies and Digital Platforms for Personal Brand Management in the “Post-pandemic” Job Market (pp. 177–189). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0333-7_14
  27. 27. Mehra, V., Bharany, S., Singh, P., Sawhney, R. S., Kaur, U., Rehman, A. U., & Hussen, S. (2025). Impacts of digital technologies and social media platforms on advocating environmental sustainability in sports sector. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00932-4
  28. 28. Naveen Donthu et al. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  29. 29. Nguyen, N., & Son Dinh, V. (2025). Editorial: Fostering impactful research in emerging markets. Journal of Trade Science, 13(2), 85–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-06-2025-073
  30. 30. Nsir, N., Alzubi, A. B., & Adegboye, O. R. (2025). Enhancing Sustainable Supply Chain Performance Prediction Using an Augmented Algorithm-Optimized XGBOOST in Industry 4.0 Contexts. Sustainability, 17(22), 10344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210344
  31. 31. OECD. (2024). Fostering an inclusive digital transformation as AI spreads among firms.
  32. 32. Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online Education in the Post COVID-19 Era: Students’ Perception and Learning Experience. Education Sciences, 11(10), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100633
  33. 33. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
  34. 34. Rammal, H. G., Kamineni, R., Pereira, V., Tang, R. W., & Ghauri, P. N. (2023). “Reel”ing it in: The Indian film industry’s survival and growth in the post-pandemic era. Industrial Marketing Management, 115, 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.10.009
  35. 35. Reizer, A., Galperin, B. L., Chavan, M., Behl, A., & Pereira, V. (2022). Examining the relationship between fear of COVID-19, intolerance for uncertainty, and cyberloafing: A mediational model. Journal of Business Research, 145, 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.037
  36. 36. Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Zegarra Saldaña, P. (2022). Exploring the challenges of remote work on Twitter users’ sentiments: From digital technology development to a post-pandemic era. Journal of Business Research, 142, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.052
  37. 37. Sergei, K., & Miroslav, S. (2025). Smart Sustainable Cities as Digital Ecosystems: Concept and Framework Description. Journal of Sustainability Research, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250080
  38. 38. Sheth, J. N. (2022). Post-pandemic marketing: when the peripheral becomes the core. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-03-2021-0074
  39. 39. Strickland, P. C., & Ratten, V. (2024). Study motivations of Bhutanese students in hospitality and tourism courses. Journal of Trade Science, 12(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-10-2023-0023
  40. 40. Truong, L., Kawalek, P., & Glass, J. (2025). Digital platforms for circularity: Tackling the challenge of secondary construction materials. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 24(3), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00111_1
  41. 41. Tzavara, A., Lavidas, K., Komis, V., Misirli, A., Karalis, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023). Using Personal Learning Environments before, during and after the Pandemic: The Case of “e-Me.” Education Sciences, 13(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010087
  42. 42. Valiati, L., & Möller, G. (2025). Cultural and creative industries in the fourth industrial revolution: heterodox economic perspectives on the EU’S triple transition. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1712537
  43. 43. Van Wyk, M. M. (2025). GenAI-powered tools for digitalising curricula: A critical AI literacy appraisal. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2025.8.2.13
  44. 44. Widaningsih, L., Rahayu, S., Dwiyanti, V., Widanengsih, W., & Muktiarni, M. (2025). Analysis and Mapping of Technical Competency Needs for TVET Teachers in the Era of Industry 4.0. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2025.17.02.011
  45. 45. Yadav, H., Kar, A. K., & Kashiramka, S. (2022). How does entrepreneurial orientation and SDG orientation of CEOs evolve before and during a pandemic. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(1), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2021-0149