Articles
DOI DOI: 10.62441/actainnovations.v63i.1149

A HOLISTIC PEDAGOGICAL FRAMEWORK: ACTIVE KNOWLEDGE SHARING WITH TRI KAYA PARISUDHA FOR DEVELOPING 21ST-CENTURY 5C SKILLS AND ADVERSITY QUOTIENT

Ni Wayan Widi Astuti1, I Wayan Lasmawan 1, I Wayan Kertih 1, I Wayan Mudana 1
  1. 1 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia.

Abstract

This study proposes a holistic pedagogical framework that integrates Active Knowledge Sharing (AKS) with the Balinese philosophical values of Tri Kaya Parisudha right thought (manacika), right speech (wacika), and right action (kaya) in entrepreneurship education. The research aims to examine the effectiveness of this culturally grounded instructional strategy in enhancing students’ 21st-century 5C skills (critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, and character) and Adversity Quotient (AQ). Employing a quasi-experimental design involving undergraduate students, the study measures the comparative effects of the AKS–Tri Kaya Parisudha model against conventional teaching approaches. Data were collected using validated instruments and analyzed through multivariate statistical procedures. The findings reveal that the integrated model significantly improves 5C competencies and AQ, demonstrating the transformative potential of combining active pedagogies with indigenous moral values. This research contributes to the advancement of culturally responsive teaching frameworks and offers practical implications for higher education institutions seeking to enhance student resilience and master 21st-century skills.

How to Cite

Astuti, N. W. W., Lasmawan , I. W., Kertih , I. W., & Mudana , I. W. (2026). A HOLISTIC PEDAGOGICAL FRAMEWORK: ACTIVE KNOWLEDGE SHARING WITH TRI KAYA PARISUDHA FOR DEVELOPING 21ST-CENTURY 5C SKILLS AND ADVERSITY QUOTIENT. ACTA INNOVATIONS, 63, 840–852. https://doi.org/10.62441/actainnovations.v63i.1149
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. 1. Atmaja, N., & Suamba, I. B. (2018). Tri Kaya Parisudha as the foundation of character education in Balinese society. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 3(2), 45–52.
  2. 2. Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2007). What works in character education. Journal of Research in Character Education, 3(1), 19–32.
  3. 3. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.
  4. 4. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.
  5. 5. Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
  6. 6. Gagné, M. (2009). A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 571–589.
  7. 7. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
  8. 8. Hesse, F. W., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem-solving skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 37–56). Springer.
  9. 9. Keyton, J. (2017). Communication and organizational culture. Routledge.
  10. 10. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  11. 11. Kuratko, D. F. (2020). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, and practice. Cengage Learning.
  12. 12. Le, H., Casillas, A., Robbins, S., & Langley, R. (2005). Motivational and skills, social, and academic self-efficacy: Their relation to college outcomes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(3), 404–425.
  13. 13. Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
  14. 14. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
  15. 15. Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21). (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. P21 Foundation.
  16. 16. Putra, I. N. D., & Antara, I. K. (2020). Implementation of Tri Kaya Parisudha values in learning activities. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 112–120.
  17. 17. Rae, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework for technology-based enterprise. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(6), 479–494.
  18. 18. Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0. Pearson.
  19. 19. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75.
  20. 20. Stoltz, P. G. (1999). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
  21. 21. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
  22. 22. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.
  23. 23. Wang, Y. (2020). Collaborative learning in entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 62(4), 451–470.